Question 1

What is evaluate.club?

Accepted Answer

evaluate.club is a web-based evaluation platform designed for organizations that run structured assessment processes — hackathons, grant reviews, startup competitions, and public-sector program evaluations. Admins build evaluation forms with weighted criteria, invite judges via secure one-time links, and instantly receive aggregated results with PDF and Excel export. No spreadsheets, no manual tallying.

Question 2

How is evaluation data secured?

Accepted Answer

Each evaluator receives a unique 32-character cryptographic token valid only for their assigned form. Identity is verified via a 6-digit email OTP code that expires in 10 minutes. All data is isolated at the organization level — no cross-organization access is possible. Submission timestamps and OTP verification records are preserved automatically, eliminating shared spreadsheets and forwarded files.

Question 3

What happens when auditors request evaluation records?

Accepted Answer

evaluate.club generates per-evaluator PDF certificates with digital signatures, and automatically retains OTP verification logs and submission timestamps for every evaluation. When an audit is triggered, administrators can export a complete evidence package immediately — no manual reconstruction required. Several public-sector clients have successfully passed procurement audits using these records.

Question 4

Is a subscription required?

Accepted Answer

No subscription or per-seat fee is required. evaluate.club uses a pay-per-form credit model. New accounts receive free credits to start immediately. Standard plans are available for organizations that run evaluations regularly, and evaluators are always free regardless of how many are invited.

Question 5

Has any public institution actually adopted evaluate.club?

Accepted Answer

Yes. A domestic public institution completed a full proof-of-concept with evaluate.club, evaluating 50+ teams across multiple rounds. Manual score-aggregation time was reduced by 87% compared to the previous spreadsheet workflow, and the program manager satisfaction score was 4.8 out of 5. A detailed case study is available at evaluate.club/case-studies/public-institution-evaluation.

도입 사례